86 Comments

I corrected two dates I confused in the column. They are correct now in the version posted late tonight.

Expand full comment

Lucian Truscott, your reportage is world-class.

Expand full comment

ABSOLUTELY!!!!

Expand full comment

Have always wondered why no search was done at Bedminster, and what's in that box with Ivana???

Expand full comment

I wonder that, too, who buries someone in a golf course, publicly, yet?!

Expand full comment

Chris—It's (don't laugh) so he can get his golf course taxed as a cemetery—seriously.

Expand full comment

He also has a few sheep in a corner of the property...tax break here too. It’s a farm. Hell with the Trump Family Sinners there, it’s a zoo!

Expand full comment

There are some quirks in NJ tax laws that allow this kind of stuff. My old company (Fortune 50) used to plant corn on part of the campus so they could get a tax break. They didn't open a cemetery for ex employees however.....

Expand full comment

Love this! I did realize that there are tax law anomalies in NJ. We used to wonder if we could apply for the farm tax break when our children behaved as if they’d been raised by wolves in the wilderness. Unfortunately, even NJ has limits.

Expand full comment

Well, wolves aren't exactly farm animals -- but a Wildlife Protection bylaw might apply . . . ;-)

Expand full comment

😂

Expand full comment

The sheep save on groundskeeping costs—wagesfree grass-mowing.

Expand full comment

Have read that the tax thing only applies to a small portion of the club, not the entire thing

Expand full comment

Right, but to me his willingness to plant his first children's mother there just so he can get a lower tax rate for *not even all* of the property is even more tacky. If those three heirs objected, the news hasn't reached me.

Expand full comment

I haven’t seen where they objected either. Isn’t tacky his middle name???

Expand full comment

He's consistent if unpredictable. Just when you think he's gone as low as possible, he digs deeper. I don't think the speculation about just what is in Ivana's inexplicably heavy coffin is misplaced.

Expand full comment

He’a such a roach and he’s spawned too many other nasty insects. A mobster, through and through.

Expand full comment

At the time this was made public, I could not help fantasizing that some stray person would request a plot at Bedminster - and he couldn't say no. (Well, he could, but then he'd lose the Club's new-found exemption status.) Think of the fun Regular Joe could have. "We're going to visit Granny's grave. It's right next to Ivana Trump's." Though come to think of it. even Regular Joe's Granny might have had standards.

Expand full comment

Regular Joe's Granny may have standards, Margo, but we know trump has none. It's not all that farfetched to imagine Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, and civilian MAGAts getting to know their maker as neighbors of Ivana—if they can GoFundMe enough $$$$ to satisfy trump.

Expand full comment

An awful lot of us wonder what else is in the ground with poor Ivana. It's a weird burial site, not that Trump isn't plenty weird, but it's just a bit weirder than that. And he'd always be able to access it no problem.

Expand full comment

Why do I recall hearing that Ivana's remains were cremated?

Expand full comment

I believe you are correct

Expand full comment

wlipman@comcast.net—Snopes calls the cremation rumor just that—an unfounded rumor. They say the same applies to documents we'd all like to think were buried with Ivana. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ivana-trump-cremated/ Your quote of Keith Olbermann's advice is highly relevant.

Expand full comment

I'm wondering how they know about the lack of documents sharing Ivana's casket. And, note that the Snopes author says that there is no evidence to suggest that she was cremated; such equivocation also can be made to read that there is no evidence that she *wasn't* cremated.

I'm sadly chalking Snopes up to be yet another of the brigade of "ain't what they used to be".

Expand full comment

Well, Snopes is perhaps the internet's most venerable fact-checker/hoax-buster. I trust no social media, where both stories surely started, do trust Snopes although I see your point about a decline. But the only way to be sure is to follow Keith's advice, no?

Expand full comment

Her grave is casket size. Now that makes me even more curious. Whatever he did with Ivana, supposedly she's on the golf course. Very interesting. I don't think the photo I saw were AI generated and altered. There is a lot of speculation he did it for a tax break. I don't know anything much really anymore.

Expand full comment

Keith Olbermann addressed this very question on his podcast with three words:

"Dig. Her. Up!"

Expand full comment

i seriously wondered why it took 10 men..i counted..to carry that coffin. ivana was cremated, right?

if she wasn't then her corpse must've taken a big fold when they packed her down the steps ¡at the slope angle!

ouch

Expand full comment

Right or wrong. Cremation is unsubstantiated, likely as not just another social media rumor. The documents, only the trumps know this side of a subpoena.

Expand full comment

so if her body was in that casket carried down the steps at that angle it was being slid and folded.

oh my

Expand full comment

And this is why you want prosecutors and their investigations. to go on as long as it takes when you get past several layers and get down to the real deal. If Smith had rushed this to prosecution, which he wouldn't have, a lot of this would have added to Trump's lifelong knack for running ahead of his legal troubles. But there always comes that day. And it looks like this is the time. Sure hope so.

Expand full comment

"Trump has always had an enemies list, or lists..."

His only "friend list" consists of rich donors. That's it. The lunatic is barely human.

Can anyone name anybody with whom he went to any school who is presently his pal? Kindergarten?

Grade school? Camp? NY Military School? Fordham? Wharton? No one who knows him likes him; of course he is paranoid, and with good reason.

Expand full comment

And, in a matter which is completely unrelated to Iranian secret documents, Saudi golf tour on trump courses.

Expand full comment

The battle-cry, always the same: “What’s in it for me?” -

Expand full comment

I’m beginning to hope Jack Smith’s investigation isn’t suffering from mission creep. It seems like he must be almost to the point where he can flip the switch and start the show.

Expand full comment

He just cracked open another vault with even more evidence. The last thing we need is him to rush this. I'm really curious now to know how bad it can actually be.

Expand full comment

Thank you for keeping us informed.

Expand full comment

Check Ivana"s coffin/casket. PLEASE.

Expand full comment

Trump is a one-man crime wave. I wonder if the DOJ ever really inspected Bedminster. If they didn't, they should right now. I bet there are still documents not found to date.

Expand full comment

Imminent might actually mean days not weeks or months. After 3 years of being teased this could be the money shot. I'm going to buy an 18 year old bottle of scotch so I can watch him get indicted and perp walked.

Expand full comment

Perp walk doesn't happen in federal venues. No cameras allowed in court, and he'll be escorted by his phalanx of lawyers. He won't have to say anything besides "Yes, No or Not guilty." As required. His indictment is probably just waiting to be filled in by a certain Jack Smith, and I bet he'll enjoy signing it..

Expand full comment

But if Garland asks for pre trial detention...he won't but he should.

Expand full comment

Would be double-edged, with The Very Stable Genius once again bloviating to his stupefied base that this is "the very worst witch hunt, lots of people are saying so, probably the worst in human history" blah blah blah yadda yadda sis boom bah humbug....

www.thenation.com/article/archive/trump-witch-hunt/

{ARTICLE Date is OCTOBER 28, 2019} by Alice Markham-Cantor

"Since the Ukraine scandal broke 34 days ago, Donald Trump has tweeted the phrase “witch hunt” 45 times. That’s the equivalent of 1.3 times a day. In nine of those instances, he asserted that the Ukraine investigation constitutes the greatest witch hunt in the history of the United States.

Given this country’s long, brutish history of witch hunts, both literal (think Salem) and metaphorical (think McCarthyism), that’s a hefty claim. But that hasn’t stopped Trump from hurling the term about like a deranged heckler. Since becoming president, Trump has tweeted the words “witch hunt” a total of 294 times, including, yes, during the Russia investigation. And before he was president? In 2013, he retweeted a supporter’s allegation that the investigation into the now-defunct Trump University was a “liberal witch hunt”—but ultimately paid $25 million to avoid a trial. In 2013, he complained in the same terms about corporate-fraud allegations against finance CEO Hank Greenberg (who settled for a cool $ 9.9 million). And in 2012, Trump used the phrase to defend Herman Cain—later his nominee for the Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors—from multiple accusations of sexual harassment. Poor Herman seemingly couldn’t buy his way out, so he withdrew his name from consideration.

If Trump wants to convince people that he’s innocent, papering himself with a phrase that he previously used to defend guilty parties doesn’t seem like a brilliant move. But it’s actually a shrewd tactic. The repetition itself can serve a powerful, reality-shifting function: A 2015 study on the “reiteration effect” confirmed that when false information is repeated often enough, people come to believe it. (To wit: A USA Today/Suffolk University poll last March found that half of Americans believed Trump’s claim that the Mueller investigation was a “witch hunt.”)

But the problem with Trump’s crying witch hunt is not just that we’re subjected to the ceaseless flatulence of his self-pitying tweets. The problem is that each time Trump tweets the term, he is doing something else as well, something both more sophisticated and more sinister. Calling himself the victim of a witch hunt allows Trump to label charges against him as not just inaccurate but fundamentally impossible. Witch hunts, by definition, are illegitimate, their victims innocent, their judgments always wrong. In a society that already lets the rich and powerful off the hook for just about anything, handing them a tool that frames holding them accountable as inherently unfair is dangerous—and other powerful players are picking up on the trick." *****

Expand full comment

Interesting read, Sir. I do love your turn of phrase "ceaseless flatulence of self-pitying tweets."

Expand full comment

That's unfortunately not my phrase, it is damn good but embedded in the text I posted via a link! Intern at The Nation Alice-Markham Cantor deserves all the credit.

Expand full comment

To make it straight forward, he should not because we all know what Trump will do after-"sic his lawyers" on the court system to delay any and all further actions. Even if he knows he will lose.

Expand full comment

The orange nut job’s make-up has gotten worse and even more Orange in his latest Fuks News screwball interview. What an incompetent imbecile!!!

Expand full comment

It would be near Mussolini-level poetic justice.

Expand full comment

The plot is not just thickening it's getting lumpy :)

Expand full comment

Lucian, from your pen to God’s eyes, as it were.

Expand full comment

At this point I'm like what's it going to take to get Garland to act? Orangehead is clearly a danger to national security right now today. Charge what you have now to get him out of circulation then use superseding indictments. Can't anybody here play this game?

Expand full comment